torsdag 13 januari 2005 16.15 skrev Stas Bekman:
Oden Eriksson wrote:
[...]
The system is clean except for parts of mod_perl 1.x that seems to be a requisite to get this mod_perl pick up missing pieces. Here's what's installed:
what do you mean requisite? you mean mp2 requires mp1?
Maybe it's a thing of the past, or I'm just too tired right now. At one time I saw something like "Found mod_perl-1.x, good, will install relatively to Apache2/". And that message was despite the MP_INST_APACHE2=1 thing.
Hmm, do you think it's a misleading message? I guess we could remove it if MP_INST_APACHE2=1 is used explicitly.
Sorry for the delay. Here's the output of this:
/usr/bin/perl Makefile.PL 'MP_CCOPTS=-O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -march=i586 -mtune=pentiumpro -fPIC' MP_INST_APACHE2=1 MP_APXS=/usr/sbin/apxs2 MP_APR_CONFIG=/usr/bin/apr-config INSTALLDIRS=vendor
Reading Makefile.PL args from @ARGV
MP_CCOPTS = -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -march=i586 -mtune=pentiumpro -fPIC
MP_INST_APACHE2 = 1
MP_APXS = /usr/sbin/apxs2
MP_APR_CONFIG = /usr/bin/apr-config
mod_perl/1.29 installation detected...ok (installing relative to Apache2/)
Configuring Apache/2.0.52 mod_perl/1.999.20 Perl/v5.8.6
OK, but I fail to see what it has to do with you thinking that mod_perl 1 is required. If you didn't have modperl 1 installed you won't have had this message, no?
-- __________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
