Stas Bekman wrote:
Christopher H. Laco wrote:
Stas Bekman wrote:
I've CC'ed David, who developed Apache::TestMB, so he will hopefully be able to give you the answers.
David, please take a look at this thread. I can't give you the link, since I don't think this new list is archived at all. Are you subscribed to it at all?
Thanks for the forward.
Any thoughts about the other issue; whether t/SMOKE | TestSmoke should autogen the configurations just like t/TEST | TestRunScript does?
What I don't understand is why do you have anything to do with t/SMOKE?
I'm not sure I understand that statement. Do you mean why I'm talking about t/SMOKE instead of t/SMOKE.PL; or why I even have a t/SMOKE.PL or smoke testing period?
I meant, that I don't understand why do you get stuck at t/SMOKE? Are you trying to use it and it's not working? Or is it the TestMB that tries to create it and fails the whole thing, when you don't even want t/SMOKE? You really need t/TEST for the test suite. t/SMOKE is for advanced testing/debugging.
-- __________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
