On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 18:47 +0000, Jonathan Kamens wrote: > I don't think it is reasonable to expect bug reporters to interact directly > with the upstream maintainer. Perhaps they should, but they won't. I > therefore don't think a bug should be CLOSED UPSTREAM unless the package > maintainer has extracted enough information from the reporter to submit a > complete, actionable ticket upstream > > Jik > Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
hey, Generally, a bug that is undergoing work for a fix requires more than just *some* initial data. For example, it might also need the reporter to try out a new version, or additional actions that would help up stream narrow down the cause. I'm just trying to think of a way to make users more involved in filing bugs and helping up stream in fixing them. It would result in a better user experience, quicker fixes (quicker karma and pushes to updates too) and would lessen the maintainer's burden among other things. regards, Ankur -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
