On Wed, 2012-10-10 at 15:03 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote: > > > I have to say I agree with you. They create too much complexity (which will > be broken by definition) to create a tiny simplification. This is an example > of overkill.
No. This BS has gone on long enough. Fedora is pretty much the only major distro shipping GNOME3 anyway so at some point handwaving about 'upstream' doesn't cut it. When does Fedora say that enough is enough? Besides, I haven't bothered to check but who wants to take bets that the genius who submitted this broken idea has @redhat.com on the end of their email address? This blame reflection game was old a year ago. Most of these guys are all in the same cubefarm but Fedora users aren't allowed to object because gnome is 'upstream' and RH doesn't listen, GNOME has an explicit policy to ignore end users so who the heck is responsible? So if the only choice for Fedora is to take GNOME from upstream 'as-is' or to not take it then so be it. Personally I think the only reaction left is a general call to simply remove GNOME as the default desktop environment in Fedora and thus to reject any changes from the GNOMEs that impact the new default. Can I get a second?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- test mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
