> dd is recommended dead last, really? Under some conditions, livecd-iso-to-disk can be a lot faster because it uses rsync to update an existing Packages directory. So if you have a USB stick of full install for RC1, then running livecd-iso-to-disk using RC2.iso will transfer only updated files below Packages [plus other files not below Packages].
Using 'dd' requires a USB stick that is "dedicated" to that single use, while the results of livecd-iso-to-disk can co-exist with other files on the USB stick. In the case of LiveCD spins, this is essential in order to make a system with persistent user data. I have not had problems using livecd-iso-to-disk with full install .iso files. The only hassles are when I switch between i386 and x86_64, or between UEFI and non-UEFI systems, both of which work better for me with a re-format. -- -- test mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
