On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 8:35 PM, Adam Williamson <[email protected]>
wrote:
> sgallagh and I both noticed that the release criteria do not currently
> include any requirements around Edition branding or installer
> customizations. We think they probably should. Thus, we're proposing
> the following new criteria. They would be in a new section for each
> page, something like "Edition requirements" or something like that,
> probably with a brief explanation of what "Editions" are outside of any
> specific criterion text.
>
> For Beta:
>
> == Installer customization ==
>
> For each Edition, all significant functional customization of installer
> behavior that are intended to be a part of that Edition must take
> effect on that Edition's installable release-blocking images.
>
> footnote: 'Significant functional?': significant functional
> customization would usually include, for e.g., changes to the default
> filesystem and firewall configuration. The WG or SIG responsible for
> each Edition has the definitive say on what is or is not considered a
> 'significant functional customization' for that Edition.
>
> For Final:
>
> == Self-identification ==
>
> For each Edition, the installer must be clearly identified as that
> Edition in all of that Edition's installable release-blocking images.
> Also, for any deployment of that Edition in accordance with the rest of
> these criteria, the relevant fields in {{filename|/etc/os-release}}
> must include the correct Edition name.
>
> Thoughts, comments, suggestions, flames? Thanks!
>
Sounds reasonable.
_______________________________________________
test mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
