Tested 3.30.1 on bare metal, i78550U . I suffer the bug here too.

btw, gnome-maps --version throws an error

Hau idatzi du Firas Dieter Nuwayhid (f.d.nuway...@outlook.com)
erabiltzaileak (2018 urr. 18, og. (11:44)):

> On my local machine the artefacts looks different after following the
> steps.
>
> The sidebar for the planning of the route doen't appear at all.
>
> Even more interesting: if I use the integrated screenshot-tool to take a
> screenshot of the window - the map disappears and the route plan side bar
> is visible. If I select a rectangle of the screen the map becomes visible
> and the sidebar invisible (s. attachments).
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Geoffrey Marr <gm...@redhat.com>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 17, 2018 4:03 AM
> *To:* test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> *Subject:* Request Testing on 1637751 - gnome-maps
>
> Testers,
>
> One of the current blockers for F29 Final is this bug regarding
> gnome-maps: [0]
>
> Based off the comments in-bug it seems that there is conflicting data
> regarding whether or not this is an isolated instance or a widespread
> issue. Can you please view the bug above, run the quick test, and report
> in-bug your findings?
>
> TL;DR
> Update to latest F29
> Ensure running gnome-maps-3.30.1-1.fc29
> Open gnome-maps
> Right click anywhere, select "Route from here", ensure that window on
> right of screen opens with no strange artefacts. Also, resize window and
> make sure no artefacts. See video here for example of wrong behavior: [1]
>
> Thanks!
>
> [0] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1637751
> <https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbugzilla.redhat.com%2Fshow_bug.cgi%3Fid%3D1637751&data=02%7C01%7C%7C2c0d4dca2efc42e87caa08d633d4d8c4%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636753386594134402&sdata=rBavOn%2FevfaVBQJKx%2BYz9nsX%2FZ%2F0%2FVdNG8M0VeeLFRw%3D&reserved=0>
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1492297
> <https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbugzilla.redhat.com%2Fattachment.cgi%3Fid%3D1492297&data=02%7C01%7C%7C2c0d4dca2efc42e87caa08d633d4d8c4%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636753386594134402&sdata=uucy2B%2FU%2FaxmgTtr0Erjt9G%2FQ7jCLkH9Jj23VYhZGn4%3D&reserved=0>
>
> Geoff Marr
> IRC: coremodule
> _______________________________________________
> test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
>


-- 
Julen Landa Alustiza <ju...@zokormazo.info>
 gnome-maps --version

(org.gnome.Maps:4284): Gjs-WARNING **: 19:26:11.529: Some code called 
array.toString() on a Uint8Array instance. Previously this would have 
interpreted the bytes of the array as a string, but that is nonstandard. In the 
future this will return the bytes as comma-separated digits. For the time 
being, the old behavior has been preserved, but please fix your code anyway to 
explicitly call ByteArray.toString(array).
(Note that array.toString() may have been called implicitly.)
0 <TOP LEVEL> ["resource:///org/gnome/Maps/js/osmTypes.js":32]
1 <TOP LEVEL> ["resource:///org/gnome/Maps/js/osmEditDialog.js":35]
2 <TOP LEVEL> ["resource:///org/gnome/Maps/js/osmEdit.js":25]
3 <TOP LEVEL> ["resource:///org/gnome/Maps/js/contextMenu.js":33]
4 <TOP LEVEL> ["resource:///org/gnome/Maps/js/mainWindow.js":33]
5 <TOP LEVEL> ["resource:///org/gnome/Maps/js/application.js":35]
6 <TOP LEVEL> ["resource:///org/gnome/Maps/js/main.js":43]
7 start() ["resource:///org/gnome/gjs/modules/package.js":209]
8 <TOP LEVEL> ["/usr/bin/gnome-maps":2]


_______________________________________________
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to