Chris Murphy composed on 2021-10-27 19:40 (UTC-0400):
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Wed, 2021-10-27 at 02:32 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
>>> # rpm -qa | egrep 'grub|prober|shim'
>>> #
>>> This F34 installation has no need of any bootloader. Yet:
>>> # dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=35 --skip-broken --allowerasing
>>> --best
>>> ...
>>> Error:
>>> Problem: package grubby-8.40-55.fc35.x86_64 requires grub2-tools-minimal,
>>> but
>>> none of the providers can be installed
>>> - conflicting requests
>>> - package grub2-tools-minimal-1:2.06-6.fc35.x86_64 is filtered out by
>>> exclude
>>> filtering
>> Do you have soft dependencies enabled? Nothing on my installed system
>> requires grubby, but two things recommend it: crypto-policies-scripts
>> and kexec-tools . If soft deps are enabled, either of those could be
>> pulling it in.
> grubby is in @core in comps
>
Does this translate to I have no option to not let it be installed?
--
Evolution as taught in public schools is, like religion,
based on faith, not based on science.
Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks!
Felix Miata
_______________________________________________
test mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
