Dear James, Thank you for the feedback.
I will include required details as you advised, from next testing cycle onwards. Thank you, Kushan Athukorala On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 4:22 AM, James Cameron <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for testing! > > On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 06:11:23PM +0530, Kushan Athukorala wrote: > > Manual Test Results for the 10.1.2 Release as of 20th August 2010 > > Please change your reference from "10.1.2 Release" to "10.1.2 Release > Candidate" followed by either a candidate number or a build number, such > as os851. > > The reason is that 10.1.2 has not yet been released, and is in > pre-release, or "release candidate" stage. > > I would not want your test results to be taken by later readers as being > made against the 10.1.2 release. Although there may be some similarity, > there's a possibility that some of these problems will have been fixed > before release. > > > XO 1.0 Hardware Testing Results > > XO 1.0 Activity Testing Results > > XO 1.5 Hardware Testing Results > > XO 1.5 Activity Testing Results > > Are all the test failures represented as tickets in bugs.sugarlabs.org > or dev.laptop.org? Can you include ticket numbers? > > The reason I ask is so that the test failures can be reviewed by > engineering. > > -- > James Cameron > http://quozl.linux.org.au/ > -- Cheers, Kushan Athukorala OLPC Automation Team Virtusa QA
_______________________________________________ Testing mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/testing
