Thanks for the tesing! On 26 June 2011 05:27, <[email protected]> wrote: > The laptop with the bad sectors that wont boot on OS22/23 boots OS870 OK
Good to hear. Please keep your eyes open for the next development cycle where we will revisit the ubifs boot problem. So far you are the only one who can reproduce it on-demand. > The stamp area in Paint is tiny (maybe I'm not using it right) Also looks odd to me - CCing Gonzalo. Here's what I did: 1. Draw a fairly large linear shape 2. Select it 3. Click the stamp tool 4. Click on other parts of the Canvas to 'stamp' in The stamped version is tiny and the shape can barely be made out. Tested on XO-1. > 10699 Opened pdf OK in Browse > 10427 Memorise journal entry icon is OK > Scratch saved to journal ->usb ->journal, opened OK > 10854 Paint launches OK, draw rectangle, select paintbrush OK > 10726 Rotate all canvas OK > 10909 Nothing selected, stamp and resize unavailable, rotate is available > (see10726) OK > 6493 portrait mode horizontal scroll OK > 8352 no warnings closing empty read session, OK > 10961 took photo OK on 5 sec timer > 10923 Fn space reveals Paint source OK Thanks - noted your verification on these tickets, Sam will probably close some/most in response. > 10599 Jukebox is not a X01.0 favorite Yep, we changed our mind on that one. closed. > 10966 Calculate named OK en Need more details on how you tested this, since it only was named badly in certain places. I added test details to the ticket. > 10853 Clock Ok Need a bit more than an "OK" here to know exactly what you tested. The ticket mentions that testing in multiple languages is needed. Even if you didn't have time to run the full test as requested, your "OK" is still useful (thanks!) but we would benefit from knowing exactly what is being OK'd :) > 3703 Text toolbar OK Not sure which ticket you are referring to here, http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/3703 is not on the list. > 10956 renamed a few sessions OK Need a few more details on your test here - where did you do the renaming? Activity or journal? Did you check the specific case mentioned on the ticket? > 10725 Created an Ad Hoc net on another laptop and joined, shut lid and > resumed, could not test resumption of Ad Hoc net because it rejoined the Wifi > router instead This is the desired behaviour - we always prefer solid and stable networks over unreliable throwaway ad-hoc ones. Needs testing when there are no favourite networks that Sugar would otherwise connect to. Thanks! This is really useful for us. Daniel _______________________________________________ Testing mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/testing
