Hi Thomas, "TE" == Thomas Esser writes:
TE> Hi, I just have uploaded a new teTeX-beta release which will soon TE> appear on ctan, e.g. the xdelta files for teTeX-texmf-beta and teTeX-texmfsrc-beta seem to be wrong: $ xdelta info teTeX-texmf-beta-20021216-20021223.xdelta xdelta: version 1.1.1 found patch version 1.1 in teTeX-texmf-beta-20021216-20021223.xdelta (compressed) xdelta: generated with a gzipped FROM file xdelta: generated with a gzipped TO file xdelta: output name: teTeX-texmf-beta-20021222.tar.gz xdelta: output length: 133140480 xdelta: output md5: 805f25fbd6c143b7ef323b3e59cbb1d4 xdelta: patch from segments: 2 xdelta: MD5 Length Copies Used Seq? Name xdelta: d711140cb8dd9e7f7a88bb7e006489fb 353111 10689 353111 yes (patch data) xdelta: 07312dcddfafafe51276d4fdd0e59d3b 132915200 18684 132787369 no teTeX-texmf-beta-20021216.tar.gz note that the output name is teTeX-texmf-beta-20021222.tar.gz instead of teTeX-texmf-beta-20021223.tar.gz are the xdelta files wrong, or they are correct, and you just renamed the texms and texmfsrc tarballs after making xdeltas? Best, v.
