>>>>> "Mike" == Mike Castle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mike> Whoops. Deleted Akim's reply, so replying to myself to at least Mike> keep it in the same thread. Mike> On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 04:08:14PM -0800, Mike Castle wrote: >> No obvious problems with bison-1.30e. This is the first >> compilation error I've encountered with bison-1.30g. Mike> 1.30h fails with same error. Mike> I generated a diff of the 1.30[eh] output, but even gzipped, Mike> it's 12k. More than I feel comfortable sending via email. I'll Mike> put it up on the web in a bit. Hopefully I'll remember to write Mike> the URL before I send this email. (If the list owners want it Mike> archived, they may to send it out anyway.) Thanks, there is indeed a genuine problem somewhere. The diffs are big, but most of the diffs are irrelevant. What is not is: | @@ -471,7 +473,7 @@ | 94, 0, 113, 0, 158, 0, 152, 154, 94, 94, | 0, 245, 246, 241, 244, 243, 0, 0, 237, 300, | 0, 271, 0, 291, 200, 0, 194, 198, 248, 260, | - 139, 178, 180, 0, 0, 262, 125, 94, 0, 124, | + 139, 178, 180, 0, 0, 0, 125, 94, 0, 124, | 112, 115, 121, 122, 0, 119, 154, 156, 151, 157, | 0, 173, 165, 169, 176, 0, 0, 276, 217, 219, | 223, 225, 227, 229, 209, 211, 233, 213, 235, 215, in the parser, and | @@ -1708,7 +1713,6 @@ | CONST_DEC_PART -> const_tok CONST_DEC_LIST . (rule 33) | CONST_DEC_LIST -> CONST_DEC_LIST . CONST_DEC (rule 35) | | - undef_id_tok reduce using rule 36 (@7) | $default reduce using rule 33 (CONST_DEC_PART) | CONST_DEC go to state 68 | @7 go to state 57 | @@ -1852,7 +1856,6 @@ | TYPE_DEC_PART -> type_tok TYPE_DEF_LIST . (rule 82) | TYPE_DEF_LIST -> TYPE_DEF_LIST . TYPE_DEF (rule 84) | | - undef_id_tok reduce using rule 85 (@26) | $default reduce using rule 82 (TYPE_DEC_PART) | TYPE_DEF go to state 78 | @26 go to state 72 | @@ -1944,9 +1947,6 @@ | VAR_DEC_PART -> var_tok VAR_DEC_LIST . (rule 126) | VAR_DEC_LIST -> VAR_DEC_LIST . VAR_DEC (rule 128) | | - undef_id_tok reduce using rule 129 (@33) | - var_id_tok reduce using rule 129 (@33) | - field_id_tok reduce using rule 129 (@33) | $default reduce using rule 126 (VAR_DEC_PART) | VAR_DEC go to state 86 | @33 go to state 82 | @@ -3137,8 +3137,6 @@ | VARIABLE -> var_id_tok . @51 VAR_DESIG_LIST (rule 194) | VARIABLE -> var_id_tok . (rule 195) | | - '[' reduce using rule 193 (@51) | - '.' reduce using rule 193 (@51) | $default reduce using rule 195 (VARIABLE) | @51 go to state 252 etc. in the output. I'll track this down, many thanks!