> IMHO, ghyphen.README should be renamed to README > > FWIW, sounds sensible to me. If you just write [EMAIL PROTECTED], they > would do it happily, I expect. (And change it in the repo, of > course, whatever repo that may be.)
I've written a replacement file and forwarded it to CTAN. > BTW, I don't maintain dehypht.tex and dehyphn.tex. > > Should there be different packages corresponding to different > maintainers? What do you mean? My stuff is in dehyph-exptl. Werner
