I tried to understand the problem and went through the existing German pattern files used by (Xe|Lua)Latex and pdfLaTeX.

The behavior that Karl described while starting this thread is hardwired in the pattern files themselves; but what astonished me is discovering that dehypht.tex is still using special tricks to cope with TeX 2.0. Now, independently form the specific patterns, is there any reason to maintain any patch to cope with a piece of software that ha been superseded more than 25 years ago? Isn't much simpler to filter the pattern file for utf-8 aware programs through the utf8 to t1 encoding and have the same patterns (coded in a different way) for all engines?

Objection: but vintage files get hyphenated in a different way! OK, but the real question is: Is the new hyphenation correct? If it is, why getting upset? The small differences in typesetting may involve a couple of paragraphs in a whole document, and probably no reader would notice the difference.

It's like using CM or LM fonts; they are almost identical, but not exactly with the same metrics; so there might be some variation in occasional paragraphs. Or it's like using or not using microtype: line breaks are different with or without this package functionality. Is the document typeset in a better way with or without microtype even if the result is different from the one obtained more that 25 years ago?

Being not a German I might miss something: being a lover of ancient books I might seem to be writing profanities about the fact of getting occasional and rare different line breaks in documents printed 25 years ago and reprinted today; but, no, I am not: a 25 year old document is not an ancient document.

Claudio

On 04/09/2015 01:41, Karl Berry wrote:
FWIW, I think changing hyphenation in (pdf)latex for any commonly used
language would cause far more problems that it would help.  Messing
around with {xe,lua}latex is one thing -- it's reasonable to break
compatibility there.

     group that their new patterns are not yet stable enough to be used in

Whether the patterns are stable or not, they are different.

Whatever.

k

Reply via email to