Élie Roux wrote: > Oh, so you are probably one of the few persons on Earth using the > TeX82 engine?
Don is another. > Let me precise my point: if you use something else than TeX > primitives, your document has no guarantee whatsoever to compile with > TeXLive 2115, whatever the good will of Karl and others. And even if > you use TeX primitives, the command "tex" of TeXLive 2115 might point > to TeX2115 which fixes a bug somewhere that might make your document > not compile, plus it might ship en_2115 patterns for the new English > language, No, it will not. It will ship Knuth's patterns for US English, the Wujastyk/Taylor patterns for British English, and /should/ ship the same patterns for all other supported languages as it has in all previous release. > For me (and 99% of "TeX" users, though not for people on this list > I'm sure) TeX is a kind of odd language with many different > implementations and ecosystems with which you can produce PDFs. "'When I use a word,' Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, 'it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less.'" (from /Through the Looking Glass/, by Lewis Carroll) Philip Taylor
