Arthur Reutenauer [2020-06-15T21:27:28+02] wrote: > Thanks all for your good wishes :-)
Welcome back! :-) > I’m still not convinced by the label “basic”, because it cannot be > used either as a description or a reference. I suggested something > derived from “one-consonant rule”, because that’s what the patterns > implement, much more closely than the original patterns for Finnish, > [...] But we can also choose another name. You write that these rules > are taught in school in Finland. What about “school”? I think “school” is good name for that. It clearly tells Finnish people what to expect. One-consonant rule is one of the ideas behind it but a name derived from that can be misleading because there are a lot of hyphenation points between vowels too (“virko-aa”, “kau-emmas”). Diphthongs are important part of this new hyphenation. “School” is good. (Maybe we, or someone, can implement strict “one-consonant rule” Finnish hyphenation in the future. We could preserve that name for hyphenation patterns that really implement only “one-consonant rule” patterns.) -- /// Teemu Likonen - .-.. http://www.iki.fi/tlikonen/ // OpenPGP: 4E1055DC84E9DFF613D78557719D69D324539450
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
