Hi All,
Yes, after publishing my changes I went to the auctex site and didn't
find 9.10p. But I use it for years and never interested in updated.
Alexander
Reinhard Katzmann wrote:
>
> Hi Alexander!
>
> > > I have some more modifications to auctex which allow to detect and account
> > > for file dependencies like .mtx->.tex->.dvi. But I was not sure that these
> > > changes were good from the point of view of the package design and
> > > hesistated to publish them immediately. Now I will place them (that is, a
> > > diff file) for everybody to try.
> >
> > I didn't find the original package, it's somewhere on CDs. I place here:
> > http://www.sobor.org/tmp/auctex/, two files of auctex-9.10p, which were
> > really modified: tex.el and tex-buf.el.
>
> The package of auctex can be found on the following site:
> URL : http://www.cs.auc.dk/~amanda/auctex/
>
> It would be nice to know on which version this patch is based. Either
> my Linux distribution still has not upgraded or it is considered
> as quite instable (I have version 9.9p installed).
>
> > Note that these changes are not intended to use .pmx as the primary
> > score source. It implements instead a direct dependency of .tex (or even
> > .dvi, if I recall) on .mtx. But it should be straightforward to add a
> > .pmx support.
>
> AFAIK up to now only mtx/pmx files are treated similar to tex files.
> Is someone working on additional "native" support for pmx ?
> (I still have to test how it looks on a normal pmx file).
>
> (Sorry, first Mail used wrong "From")
> --
> Mit freundlichen Gr��en / best regards,
>
> Reinhard Katzmann
> _______________________________________________
> TeX-music mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://sunsite.dk/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
_______________________________________________
TeX-music mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://sunsite.dk/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
