zakharenkov wrote: > > Monday, November 12, 2001, 6:30:27 PM, evita wrote: > > ejan> Use plain MusiXTeX? This is exactly the problem that keeps me from > ejan> using PMX even though it might save a lot of time. I'd need to add so > ejan> much inline TeX that it hardly seems worth the effort. > > The time saving was the very reason why I started to use PMX, I known > it perfectly well that this problem is simply naught to MusiXTeX. The > second reason why to use PMX rather than raw MusiXTeX for me is to > strike both hares at a one blow -- to get score and MIDI file. > > ejan> It's a pity. But perhaps, if the subject comes up often enough on this > ejan> list, Don will be prevailed upon to produce the necessary bells and > ejan> whistles. :) > > As I've seen in the source file (in despair trying to find were to > tweak to solve the problem, but in vain) the extension of limits > happened some two or three times at least. >
This subject was discussed in the mailing list in september this year. You might want to go to the mail archive and have a look at the thread starting here http://sunsite.dk/pipermail/tex-music/2001-September/000512.html Bye -- Christian Mondrup, Computer Programmer Scandiatransplant, Skejby Hospital, University Hospital of Aarhus Brendstrupgaardsvej, DK 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark Phone: +45 89 49 53 01 - http://www.scandiatransplant.org _______________________________________________ TeX-music mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://sunsite.dk/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
