Responding to Luigi's problem with slur numbersing, Andre Van Ryckeghem wrote
>I think the number 0 of the slur interfere with the pmx automatic slurs. >replacing the 0 by 6 helps: >... This is exactly right. As I wrote when announcing 2.35 >I'm thinking that version 2.4 will come out as a full >release whenever the postscript slur situation is finalized. >I did change the way slur indexes are calculated, in >anticipation. The numbering now runs from 0 up instead of 11 >down. Please let me know if this causes any heartburn. I guess Luigi had a little heartburn, exactly the kind I thought would happen. Yes, to reprocess with 2.35 you may need to edit older files if they have in-line TeX slurs. I changed the numbering this way because in Stanislaus Kneifl wrote that in his postscript slur package, slurs numbered higher than 9 cannot go across a page break. Before I made this change, PMX started with 11, then 10. --Don Simons NEW private email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ TeX-music mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://sunsite.dk/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
