Reinhard Katzmann wrote > Hi Christian! > > > > > > > dvips -O 0cm,-1cm -t landscape $1.dvi -o $1.ps > > > > > > in the script I sent to the list (1 cm vertical offset when I print > > > my score in landscape). 2.30 did not have this offset problem. > > > > > > > Did you really intend to have some of the instrument names of the first > > system overlapping the clefs? At least this is the result of processing > > your source with my linux/TeTeX/pmx-2.35 installation. > > > > No I didn't and on my system they do not overlap; using fracindent 0.07 > and font/music size 16 works just fine here. > > Regards, > > Reinhard > --
For as long as I can remember, even back to pre-"Ae" days, I've had to use the same vertical and horizontal offsets with my emtex setup: "dvips32 -O0.25in,-0.22in %1" . I can't say exactly why it may have changed for you (and not me), but I can't say I'm surprised either. After all, you were having problems with the original version because of a bug in the code that affected the vertical spacing whenever there was only one system per page. Now the bug is gone and the veritcal spacing is--well--different. As for the location of the instrument names, in the example you sent, you had fracindent=0, so Christian's question is a good one. But if I read your comment right, I think the answer is just that you have a different fracindent in your private copy than in the one you posted. --Don Simons _______________________________________________ TeX-music mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://sunsite.dk/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
