Roland Stigge wrote:
Hi,
after some longish debate with Daniel Taupin (where I complained about some packaging issues) I finally noticed that the aforementioned tar.gz file isn't authorized at all by the maintainer. He officially just supports the zip version of his distribution.
Not exactly: I provide the source files in a zip file, and I do not disagree with other fellow transforming it into a tar.gz, and adding any executable version of musixflx.c for all possible computers.
While a separate version customized for Unix like operating systems is a quite good idea, I propose the following:
(1) More coordination. Why should the zip file contain a different directory structure and additional redundancy (which I complained about to Daniel -- sorry, Daniel!)? The redundancy I mean is the additional system/c-sources directory only containing files already located elsewhere.
(2) When a different distribution is really needed, please document it:
(a) There should be a README file or similar describing the archive as a derived package (b) The package should even get a new name (I assume the "T" in T112 means "Taupin"?), at least slightly different
T = Taupin, exact.
Thanks for considering.
bye, Roland
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Daniel Taupin, 91400 ORSAY - France
E-mail= mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home/fax: (33)1.60.10.26.44. Rep.: (33)1.60.10.04.13, fax (work) (33)1.69.15.60.86
_______________________________________________ TeX-music mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://sunsite.dk/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
