On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Andre Van Ryckeghem wrote:
> Thank you very much, Olivier and Cornelius
>
> (cut)
>
> Many of the problems can be solved:
> Mesure 3 of Cornelius' example could also have a keychange befor the last
> note :
> % bar 3 : (second Cb)
> Cb f43u c4+u Ct f44u Cb r+5 Rd //
> r4-3 c23l c4l | /
>
I agree this would be more readable (but in the real world anyone would
prefer the 2 ledger lines on f44 in the bass clef, with no clef change at
all --- infinitely more readable!)
>
> But this one i cannot solve (changing the f44 by f24 and omitting the rest):
> % bar 4 :
> Cb f43u c4+u Ct f24u Cb Rd //
> r4-3 c23l c4l | /
>
> is bad and gives an error,
>
> Cb f43u c4+u Ct f44u su Cb f s Rd //
> r4-3 c23l c4l | /
>
> is ugly and is not a solution
>
Are we playing the baroque game of riddle canons here (J.S. Bach loved
to play that!)?? This is my solution to Andre's riddle:
===============================
1 1
4 4 0 6
0 -3
1 1 16 .0
%
b
./
w100m
r0b | /
m5400 Cb f43u c4+u Ct f24u Cb r4b //
r4-3 c23l r4b c43l | /
===============================
I reiterate my view,though, that in practice clef changes should be used
only where they are really convincingly better (i.e. more readable) than
the alternative of ledger lines (or separate staves)
ccn.
--
............................................................
Prof.Dr. Cornelius C. Noack Phones:
Inst. f. Theor. Physik FB 1 office : +49 (421) 218-2427
Universit"at Bremen secretary: -2422
Otto-Hahn-Allee Fax : -4869
D - 28334 Bremen home : +49 (421) 34 22 36
Fax: 346 7872
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW-page: www.itp.uni-bremen.de/~noack
............................................................
_______________________________________________
Tex-music mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://icking-music-archive.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
