> > I have here a discussion with (real) musiciens, who asked > > me to type some> > music. I followed the default shape of > > Don's pmx but they criticise the number of beams on trios. > > They say the 3th> > mesure on the example (commented with > > "wrong?" must have a > beam. I known> > that Don (always) > > is right but i put the question here to > collect arguments > > in the heavy discussion we have. > > So comments are welcome
> The behaviour of PMX is right: the second measure is correct, > the third one is false. Technically true - the logic is that the printed notes in x-tuplets should sound shorter than the same notes ``normally''. However I have seen both notations in good quality printed music, and in fact feel that the ``wrong'' notation is more common. As long as the result is clear, one would hope that it shouldn't matter too much! Okay, back to lurking now.... (With gratitude as always to everyone responsible for a system I use frequently, with enjoyment.) Andrew. _______________________________________________ Tex-music mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://icking-music-archive.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
