Olivier wrote > Until now, I have compiled every version of pmx according to the > instructions of Christian > (http://icking-music-archive.org/software/musixtex/musixtex-for-un ix.html#TOC17). I have followed the second method in two steps (f2c and gcc) > >But, it doesn't work with this new version 2.503! f2c doesn't produce a >pxmab.c file and the first method (with g77) doesn't work.
Thanks, Olivier. Evidently some bogus invisible characters crept into the source files, but they didn't affect my compilations within the visual FORTRAN development environment. I think I corrected them in a new version of the source that I put into the zip, without renaming the source file or zip that contains it. Please check it out and let me know if there are still problems. http://icking-music-archive.org/software/pmx/pmx2503.zip Cornelius wrote >I have 2 formal questions: > > (i) 'pmx.tex' is unchanged, compared to 2.502, right ? > Any particular reason why it' included in the zip > file ? A long time ago someone suggested I always include pmx.tex in the beta distributions. When I put this one together I remembered and acted on that long-ago request. > (ii) there is a file 'pmx2503.exe' , which must be the > win32 executable, formerly called 'pmxab.exe' . Is > this correct ? This name change (if that's what it > is) is novel. Again: any particular reason ? There's no particular reason, and I changed it back to pmxab.exe in the revised zip. --Don Simons _______________________________________________ TeX-music mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://icking-music-archive.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
