Thanks very much Don, for your work
See below text
I've long been aware that vertical spacing can get messed up when Ae is
combined with changes in numbers of instruments. It is interesting to
learn
from Andre that the \newmovement macro will accept a negative argument;
the
only stumbling block is that PMX won't let you enter a negative vertical
space. It certainly wouldn't take much effort to coerce PMX into accepting
negative movement-break vertical spaces, and I may do that in the next
release. But in the meantime, note that in this case it's not necessary.
Because of the nice behavior of the Ae command, using PMX alone you can
get
rid of those extra-wide spaces above lines 2 and 4 by putting in even
bigger
ones above lines 3 and 5 (see modified source below).
Thanks.
I find it useful also without Ae: on a system with a low note on the
end and the next system with a high note on the start (the systems then are
to
far apart and could be brought together , eg L2M-5 ).
By the way I tried to play this, but I'm not very good in 2/5 meter :-)
It is only to sing :-) (The single lines are meant for Gregorian chant,
without bars or stems, i forgot to change the mesures to a normal value in
the extract).
Propably this problem has nothing to do with the \sepbarrrules. The endbar
is still wrong when lowering the number of staffs.
Here the only thing i can think of is to use \stdbarrules.
Andre
_______________________________________________
TeX-music mailing list
[email protected]
http://icking-music-archive.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
