[ ... sorry for snipping that much:-) ...]

On Tue, 11 Jul 2006, Cornelius C. Noack wrote:

I decidedly agree with Don in most of his points, and my vote is to leave
everything in the present version as is. I probably didn't quite
understand what you mean, Don, by `removing the quote'; IMHO you
shouldn't remove anything, but for one minor point:
you are giving my tutorial quite a promotion here! Of
course, I am flattered; and if the consensus is to leave that as
it is, I solemnly promise to finally bring it up to date, viz.
MPX 2.511, as of July 11 (if I can ever manage catch up with you.

IMHO adding up the year of Kuykens's warning would be much simpler than adding
longish apologies for quoting something "potentially obsolete".

Clues:
1: a Google Group search with "kuykens musixtex awesome" gives one result in Polish from 1998.

2: Daniel's article in Cahiers GUTenberg no 21, June 1995, announces that MusiXTeX has superseded MusicTeX.

But collectors of MusiXTeX documentations are welcome:-)

Jean-Pierre Coulon                  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
TeX-music mailing list
[email protected]
http://icking-music-archive.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

Reply via email to