Dear David,Thanks for your reply. I am really impressed that Mac OS learned the path names of the .sty etc. files after running them initially at the same level without any intervention on my part .i.e. without any changing path names or databases. It is now running fine with the input source files no longer having to be in the same position, which was my fix for the problem of not finding the .sty files.
I will get to texhash etc. later once I have learnt how to compile and run musixflx in C (or maybe run a unix version via X11) on an iMac, which I have never done. I will need to look at some development literature.
But thanks for your comment on Texhash. It seems spot on. musixflx is a more pressing concern.I plan to write up some iMac installation notes and forward them to WIMA once I have worked out how to combine the output of pass 1 with musixflx and send its output to latex, hopefully seamlessly.
On 13/07/2009, at 4:39 PM, David Allsopp wrote:
Graham Norton wroteA. The good news is that TexMozartp3.tex (see attached) did compile and generate the same output as in the manual (except for the bar numbers). For this to work, the input file and the directory musixtex MUST be at the same level in the parent directory. This is crucial.Not on my PC. TeXMozartp3.tex goes through just fine, straight out ofthe box, without any musixtex directory at the same level as the source. I believe all that is required is to have a properly set up installation of TeX and MusiXTeX, with a path variable set to allowexecution of all the necessary binaries, and with musixtex.tex and all the musixtex fonts in folders that TeX can find. In MiKTeX, the latteris accomplished by placing the files in the designated user input folder or a subfolders of that, and then "refreshing the filename database."I tried putting TexMozartp3.tex in Downloads, a complely differentdirectory which does not contain any musixtex software. (I moved all myWIMA downloads elsewhere in a directory Documents/music).Then I double-clicked on it to bring up Texshop (downloaded from CTAN) and it compiled correctly in Tex . Perhaps it was just the initial runthat needed them in the same position. No need to modify any path names or a database.TeXshop should have something called a "Local Guide" (because LaTeXrecommends that all distributions have a document called that) which should explain where to put custom packages like musixtex and how to refresh theFNDB (texhash is probably the command you're looking for).C. I note that doc/musixdoc.tex (which I cannot latex)When I first tried to latex it (not tex; it's a LaTeX file), latexcomplained that it couldn't find backgrnd.sty. So I grabbed that filefrom the musixtex.zip and put it in my user tex input folder, refreshed the filename database, and the file compiles just fine.No complaints about not being able to find backgrnd.sty ; it stops with !no room for a new count(this message means TeX has run out of a particular kind of memory)It sounds like your TeX distro is possibly not using e-TeX - very near the top of the file, is there the line "entering extended mode". The first threelines of the log should be roughly: This is [pdf]TeX, Version 3.1415926[-1.40.9] ("the name of your distribution") **musixdoc entering extended modeEither that or it's possible that you're using a newer version of LaTeX which has used slightly more memory and so pushed the documentation over thelimit.
On the console window, I get This is pdfTeXk, Version 3.1415926.40.9 (Web2C 7.5.7) \write18 enabled %&-line parsing enabled. entering extended mode .....See the attached log file (curiously different from the console log file) it goes to line 3272.
musixdoc.log
Description: Binary data
l 400 \newcount\nofMPsegements Unfortunately the log file is different and I cannot past the console errors.<snip>D. Including \documentclass{article} \usepackage{musixtex} .... \end{document}around the example was a good suggestion. For this to work, my input Mozartp3.tex and the directory musixtex have to be in the same parentdirectory (i.e. at the same level). Unfortunately it still won't complete, complaining: !I can't find 'Mozartp3.aux,' \enddocumentYour sample is missing \begin{document} after \usepackage{musixtex}. AllLaTeX files get a .aux file on pass one, even though it may be empty. David _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-music
SIlly of me to forget \begin{document} .... I have been using Latex for nearly 20 years!!
Thanks for your helpful comments, Graham
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-music

