Jean-Pierre Coulon wrote: > On Thu, 14 Oct 2010, David Allsopp wrote: > > > How does putting \musicparskip before \startpiece and \vskip\parskip > > before \eject (and no other \vskip's) look to you? > > The bottom is acceptable, but I see no addtional space on the top. But > perharps you're pointing out the right direction. > > Does MusiXTeX modify \parskip and \musicparskip when it shares the > spacing? > Could another ordering of \musicparskip, \startpiece, \stoppiece, \parskip > be the solution? Can I divide \parskip ou \musicparskip by 2?
\musicparskip is actually a macro - it simply sets \parskip to 0pt plus 5\Interligne minus \Interligne. In your document, all it's doing is formalising the stretch between the staves and eliminating the underfull \vbox warning. On my system (I put an \hrule at the start and end of the document to see) I'm getting balanced spacing at the top and bottom. If you insert a \null\vskip\parskip at the top then you get much more space at the top - if that's what you're after. AFAIK, musixtex typesets each stave in a single paragraph - so setting \parskip simply provides an additional piece of control over the vertical layout (it's covered briefly in the manual) David _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-music
