Hi, 

> Hi, 
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I use musixtex to produce musical examples in latex documents, and in 
> > attempting to implement biblatex as a replacement for bibtex, I've run into 
> > a conflict with the definition of \addspace. biblatex defines a command by 
> > this name and makes it globally available, as I believe does musixtex.  
> > 
> > Does anyone have a suggestion for how to work around this?
> > 
> > Robert
> > 
> > 
> > Robert Snarrenberg, Ph.D.
> > Associate Professor and Director of Graduate Studies
> > Department of Music
> > Washington University in St. Louis
> > [email protected]
> > 
> 
> 
> Do these solutions work well?  
> 
> 
> (solution A:)
> Use attached musixltx.tex (not tested) instead of original 
> version T.61 (=the one contained in T.115 archive).
> 
> (solution B: just a makeshift, not tested)
> 
> \documentclass{article}
> \bibliographystyle{....}
> \begin{document}
> Foobar, foobar, foobar.
> 
> \begin{music}
> \makeatletter\def\addspace#1{\kern#1\global\advance\x@skip#1}\makeatother
> ....
> ....
> \end{music}
> 
> Foobar, foobar, foobar.
> ....
> 
> 
> \bibliography{sample.bib,....}
> ....
> 
> \end{document}
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Hiroaki MORIMOTO <[email protected]>
>   Tokyo, Japan
> 
> 


Sorry, i misunderstood.


\documentclass{article}
....
\usepackage{musixtex}
% read musixtex.sty with test version musixltx, before biblatex.sty.
\usepackage[........]{biblatex}
....
\begin{document}
....
\begin{music}
....
[omit]


Best regards,

----
Hiroaki MORIMOTO <[email protected]>
  Tokyo, Japan

-------------------------------
[email protected] mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

Reply via email to