>|That said, IANAL, but curly.tex's redefinition of >|\writ@staffs I think gives sufficient case it must be GPL >|in order to comply with MusiXTeX's licence.
Possibly. I'd prefer explicit licensing by the author. >|Out of curiosity, why can't they simply be renamed (e.g. >|musixcurly and musixtuplet, or something?) and given >|proper headers like other MusiXTeX modules? George Sicherman (author of tuplet.tex) prefers incorporation into musixtex.tex. Bob ------------------------------- [email protected] mailing list If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

