I’ve more or less finished the Soler quintet transcription so now I’m looking into this. But so far I’m hung up, because PMX needs to insert the \tbbl1 before the 1/16 note just before the staff jump, so it would somehow have to look into the future to know that the multiplicity of the beam was going to decrease right at the jump. It’s probably possible, but tricky. After all, PMX has no trouble decreasing multiplicity when needed within a non-staff jumping beam. So it must look ahead there, although it is in the same voice. I’ll have to review that logic.
--Don From: Don Simons [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2018 5:36 PM To: 'Werner Icking Music Archive' <[email protected]> Subject: RE: [Tex-music] more staff crossing beams Andre, thanks very much for the report. I’ve compiled this with PMX 2.87 and see that only minor corrections are needed to make it come out OK (see attachment). I’ll definitely put this on my PMX to-do list but I won’t be able to get serious about it until next week…I’m working on transcribing a Soler quintet for strings+harpsichord into a 2-harpsichord version, and I have another harpsichordist coming over on Saturday to play thru the first draft. --Don From: TeX-Music [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Andre Van Ryckeghem Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2018 5:28 AM To: Werner Icking Music Archive <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Subject: [Tex-music] more staff crossing beams Hi all, I know, we already discussed this, but perhaps this problem can be solved? In each bar in the example, the last note of the staaf crossing beam should be an 8th. It happen only in the 1st bar. Andre =========== 2 2 3 8 3 8 0 0 1 1 20 0 bt .\ Abpe w5i [l+14 g1- cs ]j rb4 | [ d1 d+ ]j rb4 | [u a1 za- ]j rb rb4 / rb8 [ju g1+ g zb g8 ] | rb8 [ju d8 zf ] rb | rb1 [ju e c8 ze ] rb // r4d r4d r4d / ===============
------------------------------- [email protected] mailing list If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
