On Mi, 25 Aug 2010, Beuthe, Thomas wrote:
> Norbert seems to feel that a manual install of the other software is
> required, and that
> these packages should not be installed by TeXLive 2009. This is the answer I
> expected
> given the philosophical leaning of the TeXLive install. Don't get me wrong,
> I understand why this should be so.
>
> Tomek on the other hand seems to feel that perhaps gs is all that's really
> needed to
> have TeX4ht working properly, and points out that it is in fact already
> provided
> with the install, albeit hidden.
Tomek is our Windows Master, so if he says so I trust him. But from what
I udnerstood and read in the tex4ht docs on quick glance is that it
uses convert, and if "convert" is not installed, and it is shipped
by *Magick then it will not work.
> My own question is a more general one. If the TeXLive distribution provides
> a certain
> package like TeX4ht, should this package not work out of the box without
> further
> user intervention requiring the installation of other packages?
That would be nice, but there are limits of what we can do. We do not
and will not provide a full operating environment.
We tried to fix that for many programs requiring ghostscript by including
a hidden copy of it. But this is already a pain. Adding more and more
programs seems not to be a feasable option for me.
Best wishes
Norbert
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Norbert Preining prein...@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
------------------------------------------------------------------------
One's never alone with a rubber duck.
--- Douglas Adams, The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy
