On 07/23/2011 03:16 PM, Victor Ivrii wrote:
Thanks! I understand that output formats multiply faster than the rabbits:-)
One thing of the paramount importance for mediawiki: output should be
easily read and edited by humans; otherwise wiki will lose it function
as a collaboration tool. While tex->html conversion by htlatex made
You are right. Wiki format generated by TeX4ht should be like the one
created by humans by hand. We can do that.
html looking exactly like pdf at the expense of ability to edit, in
tex->mediawiki the fidelity is far less important, IMHO.
By the way, can we start an unofficial collaborative project in which I
shall start to write a custom conf for TeX4ht that can format a document
you might provide in which we shall go on adding more complex structures
and environments as we progress? Surely, I need your assistance for
mediawiki format (for instance, how theorems shall be coded in wiki).
Once it is matured enough, we shall make it a *.4ht package of tex4ht
and form part of a tex4ht release that might happen afterwards. How do
you see this?
There is another interesting (but not very related) question: htlatex
produces one html page, looking like all pdf pages glued together (and
if it is long enough javascript takes eons to process it). Any plans
for pagination?
Sorry, I don't get exactly what you mean.
Best
--
Radhakrishnan
Always remember that you are unique. Just like everyone else.
