---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Philipp Lehman <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 11:06 AM
Subject: Re: biblatex/tex4ht error
To: Johannes Wilm <[email protected]>
I just received the following email from the Biblatex maintainer. It seems
this should be fixed within text4ht.
Am Montag, 22. August 2011 schrieben Sie:
> after talking to some text4ht people, I was advised to ask you if
> \blx@unitmark was in biblatex at a time and what its function was.
> After updating my texLive 2011 installation, biblatex and tex4ht
> suddenly stopped working.
Hi Johannes,
\blx@unitmark has been removed in Biblatex 1.6. I have no idea why and
how text4ht expects it, but you can probably work around the error by
putting something like
\def\blx@unitmark{}
in biblatex.cfg.
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 5:43 AM, Oleg Domanov <[email protected]> wrote:
> David,
> in the previous biblatex \blx@unitmark was defined like this:
>
> \def\blx@unitmark{23sp}
>
> So if you put this line in the beginning of biblatex.4ht, this could help.
> This is a hack of course, but works in the meantime.
>
> I hope this helps,
> Oleg
>
>
> 2011/8/22 David Bremner <[email protected]>
>
>>
>> Follow-up Comment #6, bug #126 (project tex4ht):
>>
>> My experience with the attached test files is that they work ok with svn
>> .4ht
>> files and biblatex 1.4, but fail again with biblatex 1.6. The problem is
>> that
>> the current .4ht files refer to blx@unitmark which is no longer defined
>> in
>> biblatex 1.6
>>
>> _______________________________________________________
>>
>> Reply to this item at:
>>
>> <http://puszcza.gnu.org.ua/bugs/?126>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Message sent via/by Puszcza
>> http://puszcza.gnu.org.ua/
>>
>>
>
--
Johannes Wilm
http://www.johanneswilm.org
tel: +1 (520) 399 8880
