Hey,
I played around with that over the last few days. Just defining it as empty
doesn't work. Defining it as 0pt creates problems when using more than about
20 citations. Defining it as
\def\blx@unitmark{1pt}
seems to work. This value I arrived at simply by trying around (not
scientific!) I received another email today by some tex4ht people who claim
that the way to go is to define it as
\def\blx@unitmark{23sp}
I assume they will fix the problem.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Philipp Lehman <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 11:06 AM
Subject: Re: biblatex/tex4ht error
To: Johannes Wilm <[email protected]>
Am Montag, 22. August 2011 schrieben Sie:
> after talking to some text4ht people, I was advised to ask you if
> \blx@unitmark was in biblatex at a time and what its function was.
> After updating my texLive 2011 installation, biblatex and tex4ht
> suddenly stopped working.
Hi Johannes,
\blx@unitmark has been removed in Biblatex 1.6. I have no idea why and
how text4ht expects it, but you can probably work around the error by
putting something like
\def\blx@unitmark{}
in biblatex.cfg.
--
Philipp Lehman <[email protected]>
--
Johannes Wilm
http://www.johanneswilm.org
tel: +1 (520) 399 8880
