Dear readers, I dare to bother you with a question I asked some months ago here:
http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/25555/configure-tex4ht-for-package- scrjura The answer I got did not solve the problem. So let me ask here: I'm drafting agreements on the topic of renewable energies. Trouble is, clients sometimes need a word-version = my agreement in html. The package tex4ht does the job pretty well, unless I use the package scrjura, a part of the KOMA-Script-bundle. But scrjura makes writing my agreements a lot easier, I would not like to do without it. The package allows to print the agreement in accordance to German standards. See this example: \documentclass{article} \usepackage[english]{babel} \usepackage{scrjura, indentfirst} %\usepackage{tex4ht} \begin{document} \begin{contract} \Paragraph{title=Does it make sense?} This first sentences usually talk about the sense of the whole contract / agreement / whatever. Unlike many people think, it is not forbidden to lawyers to write plain text. But there are obstacles. We need some definitions. \Paragraph{title=Share-purchase} Let's assume we talk about a share-deal agreement. We'd have to name the shares. And the price. \end{contract} \end{document} The pdf pdflatex produces is pretty. The html by tex4ht unfortunately not. Most of the format gets lost. On tex.stackexchange somebody suggested to save the code below as "scrjura.4ht": ============================================== \typeout{[scrjura for tex4ht]} \ConfigureEnv{contract}{\HCode{<div class="contract">}}{\HCode{</div>}}{}{} \append:def\parformat{\a:parformat} \append:def\parformat{\b:parformat} \NewConfigure{parformat}{2} \Configure{parformat}{\HCode{<br /><span class="sentence" />}\EndP}{} \append:def\contract@paragraph@font{\a:contract@paragraph@font} \append:def\contract@paragraph@font{\b:contract@paragraph@font} \NewConfigure{contract@paragraph@font}{2} \Configure{contract@paragraph@font}{\HCode{<br /><span class="paragraph" />}} {} \Css{.sentence{margin-left:2em;}} =============================================== But the result still is poor, compared to the pdf. It seems, that the author of scrjura, Markus Kohm, took a deep dive into the realms of TeX to realise scrjura: http://www.komascript.de/node/1540 This forum is in German, but Markus simply says, that the origin of difficulties might be the usage of low-level TeX-commands inside scrjura. Ahm, anybody here who understands both: TeX and tex4ht? If I can help, e.g. by translating comments of the source code of scrjura or else: well, sure! Kind regards, Alexander Can you help me to enhance scrjura.4ht? Or is there another way to keep scrjura and to use tex4ht?
