Thanks for trying Michal. Are you using texlive 2014? I forgot to mention
that this is on texlive 2014, Linux box.

Here is the whole folder in a zip file, which includes the
source, the html and any other files generated, and you can see
there is no frame generated.

http://12000.org/tmp/081314/missing_frame_verbatim.zip

If you get a frame, this means there is another regression bug that
happened between texlive 2013 and texlive 2014, similar to the other
one you fixed (the report/table of section issue) where it works for
you and not for me.

Thank you,
--Nasser

On 8/14/2014 9:08 AM, Michal Hoftich wrote:
Hi Nasser,

I've tried your example and it created a frame for me. When you open
file `foo.css` does it have lines:

div#fancyvrb1{ border-top: solid 0.4pt; }
div#fancyvrb1{ border-left: solid 0.4pt; }
div#fancyvrb1{ border-bottom: solid 0.4pt; }
div#fancyvrb1{ border-right: solid 0.4pt; }

at the end?

Michal


2014-08-14 15:20 GMT+02:00 Nasser M. Abbasi <[email protected]>:
Before I spend time for workaround, I thought to check what
is the status of this is.

Using

\begin{Verbatim}[frame=single]
  text
\end{Verbatim}

does not show frame in HTML but it does in pdf. Googling
around, it seems that this was supposed to work in tex4ht,
here is email posting from 2005 by Eitan Gurari

http://newsgroups.derkeiler.com/Archive/Comp/comp.text.tex/2005-08/msg00441.html

So it must have been working then? Yet on texlive 2014, I do not
get frame in HTML. Here is a MWE

--------------------------------
\documentclass[]{article}
\usepackage{fancyvrb}
\begin{document}
\begin{Verbatim}[frame=single]
text
\end{Verbatim}
\end{document}
------------------------------

Compiled with htlatex foo.tex

HTML generated is

--------------------------------
</head><body >
    <div class="fancyvrb" id="fancyvrb1"><a
  id="x1-3r1"></a><span
class="cmtt-10">&#x00A0;</span><span
class="cmtt-10">&#x00A0;text</span></div>
</body></html>
------------------------------------

Any one knows if this should have generated a frame? If not,
then why does the email above seems to suggest that a frame
was generated at that time? Something changed since then?

thanks,
-Nasser









Reply via email to