> On 08.06.2015, at 23:27, Michal Hoftich <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Thanks for the feedback. As for the citekeys – they’re perfectly valid for >> bibtex/biber. I don’t say that because I don’t want to change them, but in >> an ideal world tex4ht shouldn’t bother with them (and they shouldn’t appear >> anywhere in the final document). >> > > they form good unique identifier for link anchors. but maybe something > else should be used, as in other cross-reference stuff in tex4ht. and > as I said, I don't have access to Biblatex 3 and current configuration > for tex4ht, so I don't know whether these identifiers are currently > used. > > I've find source of some problems: in biblatex fiwi style, this is > used for printing urls: > > \DeclareFieldFormat{url}{$\langle$\url{#1}$\rangle$} > > add this to the my.cfg file to avoid math (I know these aren't exactly > the same angles) > > \DeclareFieldFormat{url}{\textless\url{#1}\textgreater}
Just to test it, I now replaced the \DeclareFieldFormat definition and deleted all problematic citekeys. Now, when I create a (X)HTML file, validator.w3.org only complains about two errors which are both related to the strange numbers in the end. A <p> tag is opened and never closed. No idea where this comes from. There’s also a warning concerning the doctype, but I don’t think this is relevant. Still, when I try to create a .odt file, I still see the same behavior. So whatever makes oolatex break, it wasn’t these two things. Simon -- Simon Spiegel Steinhaldenstr. 50 8002 Zürich Telephon: ++41 44 451 5334 Mobophon: ++41 76 459 6039 http://www.simifilm.ch http://www.utopia2016.ch „Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true!“ Homer Simpson
