On 7/26/2015 1:46 PM, Michal Hoftich wrote:
Hi all,
I am back from vacation :)
Welcome back. Please do not take long vacations, We need you here :)
The problem is in the .cfg file, I am not sure why it showed only in
current TL.
I do not know. I was copying using magic code for this part
of the .cfg as you showed it from
http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/195410/setting-image-size-using-em-units-instead-of-pt
and
http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/255826/htlatex-and-subfigures
If you look at generated html, you can see for instance
this:
style="width:6.14333.95em;"
The issue with division in \CalcRem:
\newcommand\CalcRem[1]{\strip@pt\dimexpr(#1)/\emwidth}
\emwidth is being set to \f@size, which is in this case 10.95pt. 10 is
used in division and .95 is appended to the result, which leads to
incorrect numbers such as 6.14333.95. While it may be possible to
involve some macro to round the \emwidth, it is easier to define it
directly with desired value:
\newcommand\emwidth{11}
I am still little confused. So you want just me to replace
\newcommand\emwidth{16} ----> this line
\let\emwidth\f@size
% convert pt to rem
\newcommand\CalcRem[1]{\strip@pt\dimexpr(#1)/\emwidth}
With
\newcommand\emwidth{11} ----> to this line?
\let\emwidth\f@size
% convert pt to rem
\newcommand\CalcRem[1]{\strip@pt\dimexpr(#1)/\emwidth}
? Will this works for any document size also? 11 pt. 10 pt, 12 pt?
or is it not related.
Ok, I will go ahead now and try it and see how it works out and
this will can resizing to work.
I know the earlier setup used to work. (else my whole document was
wrong) But the new setup works, and I verified it.
one just needs to make .eps file in addition.
it seems little bit overcomplicated to me :)
If I can avoid making .eps, that will be better ofocurse, less disk
space for starter. If the above fix works, will update my cheat cheat
again.
Thanks for your help Michal.
--Nasser
