On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 11:42 AM, Hans Georg Schaathun <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks a lot Michal, > > Building on your suggestions, it seems that I had three proplems. > > 1. The class file probably accounted for the missing abstract. > That was just silly of me, I should have changed it for scrartcl.
Or just plain article, it is safest solution when problems arise. But I think the problem in this case was really with wrong math. > > 2. The $\rangle$ and $\langle$ commands are not interpreted sensibly, > but they do not appear to make any knock-on effects on my side. > That does not bother me awfully. > But it is clearly a bug in tex4ht mathml, so we really need to fix that. > 3. The core problem seems to be the compilation command sequence. > Your suggestion using latex -> bibtex -> mk4ht gives correct > labels. With all the other problems fixed, htlatex still does > not get it right. Thanks for the solution. I did not see that > I could combine mk4ht with bibtex. > It just needs the bbl file, you don't even need to run bibtex if the citations haven't changes. Best, Michal > Again, thanks a lot. > :-- Hans Georg >
