Quoting William F Hammond (2016-11-24 20:05:35) > There's very little difference between tex4ht's xhtml output > and what is required for the text/html serialization of > html5. >
Sure, the basic support is quite easy, I was thinking about logical structure of the document - <article> element, how to mark up TOC, sections, footnotes etc. > In the summer of 2012 via this list you explained to me how > to get html5. To the extent that I use tex4ht (for things > originating with others) that has been working for me (with > a few mods). > > I'll append the driver script and the cfg (for use with > MathJax) that I've been using. > Yes, I remember it. It was four years ago? > As for semantic improvement I think beginning with profiled > LaTeX will be essential. > > For accessibility, I think that MathML is too close to > printer language. As with math in general, it will be > better not to go too far from the mainstream. > > As CSS gets better and better, the best bet for math > rendering in all browsers may be using the XML form of a > suitable LaTeX profile with CSS. Chrome, Firefox, and Safari > are all good with this. (See my talk at TUG 2014.) > > Likewise I think the XML form of such a LaTeX profile will > be better for accessibility than HTML with MathML. I took a look at your CSS math examples. It indeed looks interesting. This could be easier way than conversion of mathml to html using mathjax-node. Best, Michal
