Hi Reinhard, yes, they seem to be the same:
rungs.png PNG 595x842 595x842+0+0 8-bit sRGB 35.7KB 0.000u 0:00.009 convert.png PNG 595x842 595x842+0+0 8-bit sRGB 17.7KB 0.000u 0:00.000 It isn't so bad in this case, the rungs produced file that is just twice as big :) Used options: rungs -sDEVICE=pngalpha -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH -dSAFER -dFirstPage=1 -dLastPage=1 -sOutputFile=rungs.png sample.pdf Michal On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 9:20 PM, Reinhard Kotucha <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2016-12-07 at 12:11:04 +0100, Michal Hoftich wrote: > > > thanks, rungs seems to work. Images produced by Imagemagick are > > much smaller, but I guess this is not so big issue nowadays. > > Hi Michal, > are the parameters (color depth an resolution) the same? You can > retrieve some meta data with ImageMagick's identify(1). > > Regards, > Reinhard > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > Reinhard Kotucha Phone: +49-511-3373112 > Marschnerstr. 25 > D-30167 Hannover mailto:[email protected] > ------------------------------------------------------------------
