PS - I just noticed another small bug: the Unicode character for a verticle line (|) is being rendered as a dash (—) in the ODT/DOCX output.
On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 3:00 AM <[email protected]> wrote: > Send tex4ht mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex4ht > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of tex4ht digest..." > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: several bugs and a query (Alexandre Roberts) > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Alexandre Roberts <[email protected]> > To: Michal Hoftich <[email protected]> > Cc: tex4ht <[email protected]> > Bcc: > Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 09:24:14 -0800 > Subject: Re: [tex4ht] several bugs and a query > Dear Michal, > > Wonderful, thank you again! > > Best, > Alex > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 4:37 AM Michal Hoftich <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Dear Alex, >> >> I've been busy in the last week, so I was not able to take a look at >> these issues yet. I hope that things will settle down soon, I will >> start to process the issue queue then. No need to worry about the >> number of issues. >> >> Best regards, >> Michal >> >> > Just a follow-up about the bug reports/feature requests I sent out a >> week ago. I realize I asked for a lot all at once, so I thought I would >> single out a couple that are highest priority: >> > >> > 1. Superscript (and subscripts) not working in footnotes ( >> https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/474005/superscript-not-working-in-footnotes-in-tex4ht-output). >> This is the main one because it can't be fixed by find/replace. I use >> superscript to refer to the "recto" and "verso" of folios in medieval >> manuscripts (e.g., `folio 2\textsuperscript{r}` for the recto side of folio >> 2), and I use subscript for line numbers when referring to manuscripts or >> critical editions (e.g., `22\textsubscript{1-24}` for lines 1-24 of page >> 22). Especially in the latter case, information is actually lost in the >> conversion, since "221-24" means something quite different from "22, lines >> 1-24". >> > >> > 2. Less important because it's about formatting rather than >> information, but still problematic because it can't be fixed with >> find/replace, is the problem of spuriously italicized (or boldface) >> footnote hooks ( >> https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/474003/spuriously-italicized-footnote-hooks-in-tex4ht-output >> ). >> > >> > The rest are less important. The section break issue can be fixed with >> find/replace in MS Word (find ^b = Section break, replace it with nothing). >> The section numbering issue is not an issue at all (I was confused). As for >> formatting footnotes, that is certainly not urgent! >> > >> > I hope this helps. I would also like to express my gratitude to all who >> work on and maintain tex4ht, which is a life-saver for those of us working >> with publishers who are still in the Word world! >> > >> > Best wishes, >> > Alex >> > _______________________________________________ > tex4ht mailing list > [email protected] > https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex4ht >
