On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 10:46:17PM +0100, Michal Hoftich wrote: > > Actually I had a better look, and it seems that it never worked better > > than what we obtain now, after changing tex to etex. Actually the > > output did not change at all... So there is no regression, the output > > is not so good, but this has always been like that. > > > > Do you still want an example in that case? > > Ah, so it means that TeX4ht didn't actually insert any HTML for texinfo even > in the past. The good news is that we didn't break it recently. > > You can send me an example even in this case, but I cannot promise anything. > It can be really complicated to fix this.
Here it is. It is a somewhat artificial example as it is what is used to test tex4ht and latex2html conversion of @tex and @math to html in the testsuite, it is not a real manual example. -- Pat
tex_tex4ht_math.texi
Description: TeXInfo document
