My old man (an ER MD) was aware of this back in the 1950s in S Texas. Thisn
is not new news.

Ted

On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 4:38 PM, rafal kedzierski <[email protected]>wrote:

>  From 'An Estimate of the Burden of Chagas Disease in the United States',
> Clinicial Infectious Diseases, 2009, Volume 49, Issue 5.
>
> 'The United States cannot be classified as an area of nonendemicity for
> Chagas disease in the same sense as Europe or Asia. The southern states
> have enzootic *T. cruzi* transmission that involves at least 11
> triatomine species and hosts such as raccoons, opossums, and domestic dogs.
> Nevertheless, the vast majority of *T. cruzi* -infected individuals are
> immigrants from areas of endemicity in Latin America. *Only 7
> autochthonous vector-borne cases of infection (4 in Texas and 1 each in
> California, Tennessee, and Louisiana) have been reported in the United
> States since 1955 (reference from 2007). The rarity of vector-borne
> transmission in the United States, compared with Latin America, is thought
> to be the result of better housing conditions and lower efficiency of North
> American vectors.*
>
>
> Estimation of the number of *T. cruzi* -infected individuals in the
> United States is challenging, because the underlying data are sparse.
> Previous calculations have relied on a patchwork of *T. cruzi* prevalence
> estimates, derived from blood donor screening data and surveys from Latin
> America applied to the immigrant population. The highest early estimate
> (∼370,000 infected US residents in 1992) used a Latin America-wide
> prevalence rather than country-specific estimates and was therefore likely
> to be a substantial overestimation. Published US disease burden figures
> range from 50,000 to 1 million, but the lowest estimate is now 15 years
> old, and the highest estimate was based on an extrapolation of the highest
> early estimate thereby compounding the likely overestimation. '
>
> I think 7 autochthonous cases in US is probably on the low side, since
> clinicians are not looking for Chagas disease. Still, in the realm of
> reality, few thousand Texans die on the road driving - buckle up and drive
> safely. And cave safely.
>
> Rafal Kedzierski
> DFW Grotto
>
>  ------------------------------
> Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 14:21:26 -0800
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> CC: [email protected]
>
> Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Results of testing for Chagas in Kissing bugs
> in Texas
>
>  in your eye!
>
>   *From:* Lyndon Tiu <[email protected]>
> *To:* Aimee Beveridge <[email protected]>
> *Cc:* texas cavers tc <[email protected]>
> *Sent:* Thursday, December 6, 2012 4:05 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [Texascavers] Results of testing for Chagas in Kissing
> bugs in Texas
>
> Shit!
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Aimee Beveridge <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>  I am sure this was pointed out earlier but being bitten isn't the
> problem.  Its oral or open wound contact with the infected feces.
>
>
>
>   *From:* rafal kedzierski <[email protected]>
> *To:* [email protected]; texas cavers tc <
> [email protected]>
> *Sent:* Thursday, December 6, 2012 2:29 PM
> *Subject:* RE: [Texascavers] Results of testing for Chagas in Kissing
> bugs in Texas
>
>   Just throwing gas on the fire of complexity of life, I just want to
> point out that Trypanosoma cruzi or causitive factor in Chagas disease is
> not only trypanosome in the environment. Most of them are not directly
> harmful to H. sapiens. Therefore, before anyone jumps to any conclusion,
> how specific is the PCR used by Baylor College of Medicine for Trypanosoma
> cruzi? Where PCR primers used for detection tested against other related
> protozoa? Have the primers withstood the test of clinical practice?
>
> Rafal Kedzierski
> DFW caver
>
>   From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 14:18:40 -0600
> Subject: [Texascavers] Results of testing for Chagas in Kissing bugs in
> Texas
>
>  Folks,
>
> Back in June, I collected four kissing bugs from the Deep and Punkin
> preserve in Edwards County, Texas.  This was in support of some research
> being conducted by the National School of Tropical Medicine, Baylor College
> of Medicine.  Two of the bugs were captured in the cabin and two were
> captured around the porch areas.  Here is the email recently sent to me by
> Kristy Orsburn Murray a researcher at Baylor.
>
> We finally were able to develop and establish the PCR for testing the
> insects for Chagas.  We ran the PCRs yesterday.  I wanted to let you know
> that 3 of the 4 kissing bugs were positive, including the blood fed
> triatomine.  It was still alive when we received it, and it had defecated
> in the Ziploc baggie. We took the feces separate from the insect and also
> ran PCR, and the feces was positive.  This was the insect that said it was
> found under a rug in one of the cabins.  We are running a blood meal
> analysis on it to see if we can identify the source of the blood meal.  If
> human, do you know who was in that cabin at the time of the collection?
> Perhaps we should test those of you who might be exposed to these insects.
> With such a high percentage positive, the risk for transmission of Chagas
> could be high.
> Let me know if you have any questions.  We are happy to help.
> Best wishes
> Kristy
>
> I suspect that the results from the bugs collected at the Deep Cabin are
> not unique to south Texas and that many of these bugs are positive.  I have
> five additional bugs from Bexar County that will be submitted for testing.
> Chagas is not a nice disease and I suspect that a number of cavers who have
> camped out in the hill country over the years have been exposed. Below are
> some links on Chagas information.
>
> It is a personal decision on whether you should get tested and where and
> how you sleep. I’m sure this will create some lively discussions.
>
> Geary Schindel
>
>
>
> http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/local_news/article/Chagas-disease-carrier-may-be-threat-in-Texas-3650719.php(From
>  San Antonio Express News)
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chagas_disease            (From Wikipedia)
>
> http://www.cdc.gov/parasites/chagas/           (From Centers for Disease
> Control)
>
> http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/chagas-disease/DS00956          (From
> Mayo Clinic)
>
> http://www.who.int/topics/chagas_disease/en/         (From World Health
> Organization)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Lyndon Tiu
>
>
>

Reply via email to