The TSA tried an online forum several years ago.....and Texas Cavers did not 
use or support it.

Sent from my iPhone

On May 22, 2011, at 10:56 AM, R D Milhollin <[email protected]> wrote:

> Why reinvent the wheel?
> 
> www.forums.caves.org/
> 
> --- On Sun, 5/22/11, Brandon Cook <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> From: Brandon Cook <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Re: Texascavers and Facebook registration
> To: 
> Cc: "TexasCavers" <[email protected]>
> Date: Sunday, May 22, 2011, 1:09 AM
> 
> It's a shame there is not an online forum for caving... why is that? IMHO a 
> forum solves these issues that many are bickering about, without the privacy 
> issues.
> 
> I personally think the list-serve is very lame and an out of date method of 
> communication. I've canceled once, only to reluctantly came back because that 
> seemed like the only way to get the info. I also think trying to replace it 
> with Facebook is a bad idea for the many reasons mentioned.
> 
> Forums allow anonymity if desired, can be setup to forward to email all or 
> only interested "subscribed" threads or sub-forums, can be used to post news, 
> events, pictures, videos, etc. There can be private threads if needed as 
> well. Users may create their own threads which can be easily ignored without 
> all the inbox spam. 
> 
> Best of all, the wealth of information provided by the contributors is 
> cataloged and easily searchable for future reference. There is occasionally 
> some really interesting stuff ya'll put out there on CaveTex, but mostly just 
> fills my inbox with more garbage like this email (sorry).
> 
> Take a look at  http://www.cavediver.net/ if you need a good example. If it's 
> know-how that's needed, I can put you in touch with a local, and very 
> successful creator of many forums for direction.
> 
> Just my $0.02
> 
> Best of luck sorting this out ;-)
> 
> Brandon
> 
> --- On Sun, 5/22/11, Rod Goke <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> From: Rod Goke <[email protected]>
> Subject: [Texascavers] Re: Texascavers and Facebook registration
> To: "Charles Goldsmith" <[email protected]>, "Katherine Arens" 
> <[email protected]>
> Cc: "TexasCavers" <[email protected]>
> Date: Sunday, May 22, 2011, 12:10 AM
> 
> 
> Katie and Charles both made good points on this issue. I agree with Charles 
> that making Texascavers a member of Facebook would be likely to generate too 
> much unwanted traffic and drive more people away, but what if it were done 
> with a separate FB (Facebook) list, similar to the existing OT list, to which 
> cavers could subscribe if they were interested? 
> 
> Regardless of whether or not this is done, I agree with Jim and others that 
> announcements of general interest to cavers should be copied to the main 
> Texascavers list even if they are posted to Facebook. The main reason for a 
> separate FB list would be to give the Facebook enthusiasts a convenient way 
> to copy messages to their caver friends who are not registered with Facebook, 
> even when those messages are not sufficiently "on topic" to post on 
> Texascavers.
> 
> This might help somewhat to alleviate the split that has been growing 
> recently within the caving community between those who want to use Facebook 
> and those who do not. On one side, we have Facebook enthusiasts who are 
> increasingly using Facebook to communicate with their caver friends and 
> announce caving related events. They apparently either don't know or don't 
> care much about the potential privacy pitfalls of Facebook and tend to assume 
> that anyone who hasn't signed up for it has simply failed to do so out of 
> ignorance about its benefits. On the other side, we have people (like myself) 
> who have been resisting pressure to sign up for Facebook, because of concern 
> about some of Facebook's privacy related policies and practices. In some 
> cases, people may be reluctant to sign up strictly out of concern for their 
> own privacy, and in other cases, people also may be concerned about the 
> broader long range social implications of these policies and practices. After 
> all, Facebook now has significantly more users than the entire population of 
> the United States, so whatever it does can have major consequences, both 
> nationally and internationally.
> 
> Facebook hardly allows you to do anything until you "sign up", or register, 
> with them, and this registration procedure demands your real name, email 
> address, sex, and date of birth. Most troubling is the demand for your date 
> of birth, since giving this information in combination with your name is 
> technically similar to providing your social security number, in that, for 
> most people, it forms a unique identifier which can be used to link whatever 
> data Facebook has about you together with data about you in other databases. 
> This information, like your social security number, has significant potential 
> for misuse, either by identity thieves gaining unauthorized access to the 
> data or by corporate and/or government entities using the database in ways 
> you never anticipated. Consequently, it is information that should be given 
> to a company only on a legitimate "need to know" basis, not just to any 
> company that thinks it can generate more money from its database by including 
> your date of birth. Facebook's sign up page claims that they require "all 
> users to provide their real date of birth to encourage authenticity and 
> provide only age-appropriate access to content," but, in my opinion, this 
> hardly constitutes a legitimate "need to know." How does it "encourage 
> authenticity" when people can just as easily lie about their date of birth as 
> they can anything else? If they truly want the information to provide only 
> age-appropriate access to content, then they could just as well ask whether 
> your age falls within certain relevant ranges, without requiring your precise 
> date of birth.
> 
> A mechanism similar to what Katie suggested, but perhaps with a separate list 
> to overcome the problem Charles mentioned, might help to bridge the gap 
> between the users and the nonusers of Facebook within the caving community. 
> Cavers concerned about Facebook's privacy issues might prefer to use this 
> mechanism, just as people concerned about Google's privacy issues often 
> prefer to use startpage.com or startingpage.com instead of google.com for 
> their Google searches (something worth trying if you're not already familiar 
> with it). I'm not sure whether or not the suggested mechanism would actually 
> work out, but it's something for the cavers to consider if Charles is willing 
> to look into it.
> 
> Rod
> [email protected]
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Charles Goldsmith 
> Sent: May 19, 2011 11:41 AM
> To: Katherine Arens 
> Cc: [email protected], Mark Minton 
> Subject: Re: [Texascavers] TSA-ANL, Facebook, and caving
> 
> Katie, it COULD, but I won't do it, I'm sorry, facebook just doesn't have
> any proper filters in place, and it would just spam the list, driving more
> people away.
> 
> Nice idea though.
> 
> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Katherine Arens
> wrote:
> 
> > Radical suggestion: could "[email protected]" become a member
> > of facebook? If so, then what "it" posts could be forwarded to the list . .
> > .
> > katie
> >
> >
> > Elegantly stated, Jim. I think David must spend more time on
> >> Facebook than most anyone I know, and I doubt he is representative of 
> >> cavers
> >> in general. If people insist on using Facebook or any other social medium
> >> for caving announcements, at the very least they should cc Texascavers
> >> (CaveTex) with the message. That takes no extra time, and insures that the
> >> wider audience of Texas cavers gets the message.
> >>
> >> Mark Minton
> >>
> >> At 10:42 AM 5/19/2011, Jim Kennedy wrote:
> >>
> >> David,
> >>>
> >>> You are missing the forest for the trees. There already IS something out
> >>> there like you describe, and it works. It's called CaveTex. Look at it
> >>> this way, you have to have email to be on Facebook. If you have email, and
> >>> you are a caver, you SHOULD already be on CaveTex.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Please reply to [email protected]
> >> Permanent email address is [email protected]
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > ************************
> > Katherine Arens Office Phones: (512) 232-6363
> > [email protected] Dept. Phone: (512) 471-4123
> > Dept. of Germanic Studies FAX (512) 471-4025
> > 1 University Station C3300 Bldg.Location: Burdine 336
> > University of Texas at Austin Office: Burdine 320
> > Austin, TX 78712-0304
> >
> > -. .-
> > _..-'( )`-.._
> > ./'. '||\\. (\_/) .//||` .`\.
> > ./'.|'.'||||\\|.. )O O( ..|//||||`.`|.`\.
> > ./'..|'.|| |||||\`````` '`" '` ''''''/||||| ||.`|..`\.
> > ./'.||'.|||| ||||||||||||. . |||||||||||| ||||.`||.`\.
> > /'|||'.|||||| ||||||||||||{ }|||||||||||| ||||||.`|||`\
> > '.|||'.||||||| ||||||||||||{ }|||||||||||| |||||||.`|||.`
> > '.||| ||||||||| |/' ``\||`` ''||/'' `\| ||||||||| |||.`
> > |/' \./' `\./ \!|\ /|!/ \./' `\./ `\|
> > V V V }' `\ /' `{ V V V
> > ` ` ` V ' ' '
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- Visit 
> > our website: http://texascavers.com To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
> > [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: 
> > [email protected]

Reply via email to