Agreed. Nice that the cave moved up in the long and deep
cave lists, although they must have been using an out-of-date deep
list, since at the old depth of 24 m it would have been nowhere near
65th, but rather less than 126th, the limit of the list at
<http://www.utexas.edu/tmm/sponsored_sites/tss/longdeep/tssdeepcaves.htm>.
Or maybe they meant 165th... The new depth of 72 m also puts them at
21st, not 14th as they claim. At least they got the length ranking right.
Mark
At 09:28 AM 3/4/2012, caverarch wrote:
Fine article, indeed!
Roger G. Moore
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Kennedy <[email protected]>
To: CaveTex <[email protected]>; Allan Cobb
<[email protected]>; Andy Gluesenkamp <[email protected]>; Ann
Scott <[email protected]>; Bill Russell
<[email protected]>; Butch Fralia <[email protected]>; Carl Kunath
<[email protected]>; David McKenzie
<[email protected]>; James Reddell
<[email protected]>; Jerry Atkinson
<[email protected]>; Kevin Stafford <[email protected]>; Logan
McNatt (work) <[email protected]>; Marvin Miller
<[email protected]>; Peter Sprouse <[email protected]>;
Ron Ralph <[email protected]>
Sent: Sun, Mar 4, 2012 8:18 am
Subject: [Texascavers] nice article on recent exploration in Phantom
Springs Cave
Courtesy of Tom Iliffe. See the next-to-last paragraph for updated
long and deep stats.
http://www.admfoundation.org/projects/phantom/phantomcave.html
-- Jim
Please reply to [email protected]
Permanent email address is [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
