Surely, someone somewhere has done a chemical analysis on Kodak's formula--or it's otherwise a matter of record. In any case I bet the chemicals could be reproduced if someone just had to have um. Still, my digital camera serves me fine for the sort of record shots and occasional artsy-fartsy photos I've traditionally taken even though it's not as easy to use. --Ediger
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Carl Kunath <[email protected]> wrote: > It is my understanding that Kodachrome has been put to rest not just because > demand has been reduced to nearly nothing, but because Kodak has decided to > cease production of the chemicals necessary to process the film. The few > remaining processing facilities were willing to provide service but could > not do so without the necessary chemicals. > > Who among us would set aside their digital camera and return to film? > > ===Carl Kunath > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Mixon Bill > To: Cavers Texas > Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 11:46 AM > Subject: [Texascavers] Kodachrome RIP > For all you old cave photographers out there: According to the NYT, > the last Kodachrome processing machine in the world was shut down for > good yesterday. > www.nytimes.com/2010/12/30/us/30film.html > --Mixon > --------------------------------------------------------------------- Visit our website: http://texascavers.com To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
