I assumed as much. Jim, or anyone, it was said that this expansion to Oklahoma was definitely a human transmission, not via a bat colony. Is this because there are no bats that go between Oklahoma and any other infected area?
I thought I had read a while back that all of the experts were pretty sure that it was only transmitted via bat, that they didn't think that humans were the cause of the spread, but I cannot find that tidbit, so I'm not sure how reliable that is. Care to clarify, or point me to a link if you have one. Thanks Charles On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Jim Kennedy <[email protected]> wrote: > We are waiting for official confirmation to include Oklahoma. A press > release is expected later today. We know the folly of relying on the > internet as your sole source of information. J > > > > Jim “Crash” Kennedy > > Cave and Mine Resources Specialist > > Bat Conservation International > > > > > > *From:* Charles Goldsmith [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Wednesday, May 19, 2010 3:15 PM > *To:* Diana Tomchick > *Cc:* Cave Tex; DFWgrotto; Metroplexcavers > *Subject:* Re: [Texascavers] New map of WNS transmission from BCI > > > > Are the reports from western Oklahoma too recent for this? > > > > On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Diana Tomchick < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > http://www.batcon.org/images/stories/WNS_StatusMap_20100519_WNS_WebpageLarge.jpg > > >
