Fritz, this should not have gone to the list, that's what a reply is
for and not a reply to all.

On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Fritz Holt <[email protected]> wrote:
> Joe,
>
>
>
> This should be OT but I will stick with this venue for my final post on the
> matter. Your reply is well put, thanks. I thought about our confrontational
> posts last night and below is what I intended to send you this morning.
>
>
>
> Joe,
>
>
>
> Please disregard my last post. I felt your response of yesterday was
> somewhat rude and responded spontaneously. I should have taken it as
> deserved criticism and let it go. With luck I will see you at the
> convention.
>
>
>
> Fritz
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: Joe Ranzau [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 5:35 PM
>
> To: Fritz Holt
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Minnow
>
>
>
> As a recovering prolific poster from around 14 years ago I can appreciate
> where you are coming from.  It took several years of folks gently guiding
> (bashing me over the head) for me to change.
>
>
>
> You have much to contribute but your potential is diluted by each posting.
>
>
>
> Others have put this much more eloquently than I am capable of. This list is
> not for back and forth chit chat like the GHG listserve often is.
>
> Substantive replies are encouraged. Three word quips while posted are not
> needed but a few are easily tolerated. 37 different back and forth quips
> cause people like my good friend Martha to jump ship and others to filter
> you out. I can easily block all your messages but want to hear what you have
> to say so I'm taking the intervention route. Roger's note was obviously not
> understood so I went for blunt.
>
>
>
> This is like a virtual camp fire where discussion and differing opinions are
> encouraged. But just like at a big camp fire if a few folks feel the need to
> have a different conversation you get up from your chairs and take it
> outside the circle.  If you don't someone will throw empty beer cans at you
> until you get the hint.
>
> Please don't take any of this the wrong way. Try not to continue down this
> path because we would hate to resort to the kind of stuff that would make
> Cheney proud.
>
>
>
> Respectfully,
>
>
>
> Joe
>
>

Reply via email to